Alert:RTOs Hide Pricing
Compare →
Fair Response Process

Right of Reply

We believe in fair and balanced representation of all training providers. Our Right of Reply process ensures providers can respond to concerns, correct inaccuracies, and maintain their voice in the conversation.

24-48 Hour Response
Fair Investigation
Transparent Resolution

Types of Responses We Handle

Different types of requests are processed according to their urgency and complexity.

Factual Corrections

Address inaccuracies in provider information, pricing, or course details.

High Priority
24-48 hours

Common examples include:

Incorrect course pricing or payment plan information

Outdated contact details or campus locations

Misrepresented course delivery methods or duration

Inaccurate accreditation or ASQA registration details

Errors in provider background or company information

Content Concerns

Respond to editorial content, reviews, or comparative analysis.

Standard Priority
3-5 business days

Common examples include:

Concerns about comparative rankings or methodology

Response to student reviews or testimonials

Clarification of business practices or policies

Additional context for investigative content

Updates to provider services or offerings

Dispute Resolution

Formal disputes requiring detailed investigation and response.

Complex Priority
7-10 business days

Common examples include:

Disagreement with provider assessment or rating

Concerns about editorial bias or unfair representation

Disputes over compliance or regulatory matters

Challenges to investigative findings

Complex multi-party situations requiring mediation

Our Response Process

A structured approach to ensure fair and timely resolution of all requests.

Step 1

Submit Request

Contact us with specific details about the content requiring response.

Clearly identify the specific content or claim

Provide supporting documentation where applicable

Include authorized contact person for the organization

Specify desired outcome or correction

Step 2

Initial Review

Our editorial team reviews the request and determines appropriate action.

Verify legitimacy of request and authority to respond

Assess urgency and categorize request type

Identify additional verification requirements

Set timeline expectations for response

Step 3

Investigation

Thorough review of claims with independent verification where needed.

Cross-reference claims with official records

Consult additional sources and documentation

Interview relevant parties if required

Document findings and evidence

Step 4

Response & Resolution

Implement corrections, publish responses, or provide explanation of decisions.

Make verified corrections with clear acknowledgment

Publish provider responses alongside original content

Update comparative data if warranted

Notify requester of final outcome and actions taken

Best Practices

  • Be specific about the content requiring correction
  • Provide supporting documentation where possible
  • Include official contact information for verification
  • Maintain professional tone in all communications
  • Focus on factual accuracy rather than opinion

Important Notes

  • Right of reply doesn't guarantee content removal
  • We maintain editorial independence in all decisions
  • Responses may be published alongside original content
  • Vexatious or repeated unfounded requests may be declined
  • Legal threats will not influence editorial decisions

Submit a Right of Reply Request

Ready to submit a response request? Contact our editorial team with specific details about the content requiring attention or correction.

Quick response times
Fair investigation process
Transparent communication
Submit Request

Right of Reply policy last updated: December 2024

Process reviewed regularly to ensure fairness and effectiveness