Ethics Aren't an Afterthought
This platform exists because the Certificate IV in Real Estate Practice market is full of noise, half-truths, and unfair tactics. Our role is to clear that fog and give students a fair shot.
Correcting Information Asymmetry
We built this platform to ensure students deserve the same level of clarity and accountability that regulators and RTOs already hold in theory — but often fail in practice.
Our Core Values
Transparency
We show our methodology, publish disclaimers, and maintain an open Right of Reply for all providers.
Independence
We are not an RTO, and we do not sell rankings. Our comparisons are built on data and evidence.
Accountability
Every claim we make can be traced to regulation, verifiable sources, or first-hand student reports.
Fairness
Students and RTOs both get the chance to be heard. Evidence decides the rest.
Our Commitments
To Students
- No hidden pay-to-play rankings
- Transparent methodology and data sources
- Tools to compare providers on equal footing
- Protection of your anonymity in reviews
- Access to real student experiences
To RTOs
- Fair evaluation based on public data
- Right to contest findings with evidence
- Opportunity to improve standings transparently
- Clear criteria for all assessments
- Regular review cycles for accuracy
To the Industry
- Compliance with all applicable laws
- Support for vocational education reform
- Promotion of higher industry standards
- Evidence-based advocacy for improvement
- Collaborative approach to positive change
What We Don't Do
We don't sell rankings or 'sponsored spots'
We don't take down reviews unless they're demonstrably false
We don't manipulate students toward specific providers
We don't shy away from publishing uncomfortable truths
"Our ethics page is more than words — it's the baseline students can hold us to. Every decision we make, every analysis we publish, and every tool we build is guided by these principles."— Simon Dodson, Founder
Hold Us Accountable
If you believe we've fallen short of these standards, we want to know. Your feedback helps us maintain the integrity this platform was built on.
Source Protection: Individual names and identifying details have been changed or anonymized to protect source privacy and safety. All testimonials and quotes represent genuine experiences but use protected identities to prevent retaliation against vulnerable individuals.
Data Methodology: Statistics, analysis, and findings presented represent Tribune research methodology combining publicly available information, industry analysis, regulatory data, and aggregated source material. All data reflects patterns observed across the CPP41419 training sector rather than claims about specific organizations.
Institutional References: Training provider names and organizational references are either anonymized for legal protection or represent industry-wide practices rather than specific institutional allegations. Generic names are used to illustrate systematic industry patterns while protecting against individual institutional liability.
Investigative Standards: This investigation adheres to standard investigative journalism practices including source protection, fact verification through multiple channels, and pattern analysis across the industry. Content reflects Tribune editorial analysis and opinion based on available information and industry research.
Editorial Purpose: Tribune investigations aim to inform consumers about industry practices and systemic issues within the CPP41419 training sector. Content represents editorial opinion and analysis intended to serve public interest through transparency and accountability journalism.
© 2025 The Tribune - Independent Investigation Series
Protected under investigative journalism and public interest editorial standards